.
Feedback

Rethinking Ways To Reduce Teen Driving Accidents

Do parents want greater restrictions imposed on their teen drivers?

 

Drivers between the ages of 16 and 19 are four times more likely to die in a crash than drivers who are 25 to 69. Teen drivers not only put themselves at risk, but often times other parties as well. To further complicate matters, distracted driving is becoming an epidemic.

A recent University of Utah study found that increases the risk of a crash by eight times, making texting while driving twice as dangerous as drinking and driving. Texting is considered one of the top communication methods of teens, who average about 100 texts per day.

One of the biggest challenges facing teen drivers is a lack of education and driving experience. So what can be done to help reduce teen accidents? This past week, my daughter’s college friend from Canada stayed with us and we learned of Canada’s system for teen drivers.

Canada has what is known as a graduated licensing system. In Quebec, teens are able to obtain a learners permit at age 16. Then, after a year (8 months with a driver’s education program) the teen can apply for a probationary license which still has several restrictions. Holders of this license are limited to four points (as opposed to 15 for a regular driver’s license), before their license is suspended for three months.

Canada’s system of suspending a teen’s driver’s license after receiving a limited number of “points” seems like a good way to educate teens and provide them with a stern reminder, the suspension of their license, for failing to comply with motor vehicle laws.

Potentially, with more education and experience behind the wheel, and with more stringent penalties, we can reduce the number of injuries and deaths caused by teen drivers. This objective might be more easily accomplished if we were to institute a method of suspending a teen's license if the teen is caught breaking the rules of the road, such as talking on their cell phone or texting while driving. In addition to suspending the teen's license a mandatory driver retraining program could also be required.

As parents, we sometimes assume that once our teen gets their license that they are adequately prepared to operate a motor vehicle with little further involvement on our parts. It is important to remember that this is the time when we need to be most vigilant in helping to educate and monitor our teen's behavior. If they realize that they run the risk of losing their license for violations such as texting while driving then this might help to curb this very dangerous behavior and hopefully prevent these needless accidents.

What do you think?

Richard P. Hastings is a Connecticut personal injury lawyer at Hastings, Cohan & Walsh, LLP, with offices throughout the state. A graduate of Fordham Law School, he has been named a New England Super Lawyer and is the author of numerous books. He is an outspoken advocate for teen driver safety reform and education and as a result was appointed to DMV Commissioner Melody Currey's Advisory Committee on Teen Safe Driving which is investigating proposed national models for parent and teen education and accident prevention. The views here are his own and not that of the Committee. He can be reached at 1(888)CTLAW-00 or by visiting www.hcwlaw.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Woodbury-Middlebury Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michael Nelson March 24, 2013 at 02:26 pm
How many kids is 18.1% of all students? According to wiki, there are 37.9 million kids in primaryRead More school. High school represents 4/13 of that number (roughly) so that's about 11.6M kids, give or take, in high school who smoke. Yikes.
Shirley B. Backus March 24, 2013 at 01:56 am
Today's drug prohibition is getting violent criminals off the street - how many are in prison rightRead More now? Abuse of crack cocaine, heroin and the like have been proven to alter the brain chemistry, changing the user's personality, and frequently making them violent when they otherwise would not hurt a fly. These drugs are also used to benefit people who need them as prescribed by doctors. Tobacco has no such benefits. And skydiving? What does that have to do with tobacco? Does the skydiver harm other's health a month or more after he/she's been on the ground? No. Tobacco smoke does. It's called third hand smoke. Value? How can you compare art and entertainment with smoking? Anybody can attend an art gallery and not adversely affect anybody else. Any normal person can watch TV or play video games without committing suicide or harming anybody. Smoking hurts everybody and helps no one every time a smoker lights up. Drugs and alcohol, when used in moderation or under the direction of a doctor, can be helpful. Tobacco can not make the same claim.
Archie Bunker March 23, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Can you explain what the value of Roses are? Or Art? Or television? WOW dude, this is what'sRead More troubling you at 2:10 am?